The dual gray-and-white backgrounds of Morningstar’s data software is an aesthetic departure from Eikon and Bloomberg, but it isn’t the only difference.
Still, it remains the Bloomberg terminal’s leading rival with about 30 percent of the financial data market’s share – about the same size as Bloomberg’s slice. You cannot do any legitimate analysis on Eikon.” “The charts are practically non-existent.
“Apart from the user interface, Thomson Reuters Eikon doesn’t prove any value whatsoever,” writes Anandmar Pun on. Thomson Reuters offers a sophisticated stream of up-to-the-second financial data that resembles what is available via the Bloomberg Terminal, and many say the clean user interface gives it an advantage over Bloomberg’s somewhat-cluttered design. So, if you fear that Bloomberg’s culture may breed endemic snooping and you’re not savvy enough to MacGyver your own data desktop, here are five alternatives to the Bloomberg terminal: Doctoroff called the now-terminated policy “a mistake” and said the company revoked the policy last month “so that all reporters only have access to the same customer relationship data available to our clients,” he wrote in a blog post.īut that may not be enough for some customers, who may see in this now-viral scandal a chance to challenge Bloomberg’s share of the international market for providing financial data to investors, banks and government agencies, among others.Īnd at about $20,000 a year per terminal, Bloomberg is one of the most expensive financial data services on the market. Treasury Department, both Bloomberg customers, began investigating the privacy breach.ĬEO and President Daniel L.
Bloomberg LP could lose market share in the lucrative business of providing financial data to Washington and Wall Street since the revelation that it gave its reporters access to information about clients who pay for that financial data.
0 kommentar(er)
